Ombudsman Information |
Ombudsmen in the News |
Volunteers |
About ORC |
Center Updates |
Site Guide |
What's New |
30th Birthday Celebration |
What Ombudsmen Say |
Fact Sheet |
30 Years! |
Photo Album |
Photos May 21, 2002 |
Press Release May 21, 2002 |
AoA Media Advisory |
National Training |
Spring Photos 2005 |
National Training 2006 |
Salem Photo Album 2006 |
NORC Training Conference |
NORC Training Conference Calls |
30 Years! 30 Years!
The
Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program 1972-2002
Program Milestones
(printable
pdf
version)
1972
In implementing President Nixon’s 1971 Eight Point Initiative to
improve nursing home care, the Health Services and Mental Health
Administration funded nursing home ombudsman demonstration projects in Idaho,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Wisconsin and Michigan (the latter through the National
Council of Senior Citizens) to “respond in a responsible and constructive
way to complaints made by or on behalf of individual nursing home patients.”
1973
Additional demonstration projects were started in Massachusetts and
Oregon. The Ombudsman Program was
transferred to the Administration on Aging (AoA).
1975
Amendments to the Older Americans Act authorized funding for state
ombudsman programs.
Following
an assessment of the findings and accomplishments of the seven demonstration
projects, former Commissioner on Aging Arthur S. Flemming invited all State
Agencies on Aging to submit proposals for “to enable the State Agencies to
develop the capabilities of the Area Agencies on Aging to promote, coordinate,
monitor and assess nursing home ombudsman activities within their services
areas.” All states except Nebraska and Oklahoma applied for and
received one-year grants ranging from $18,000 for most states to $57,900 for
New York, which was then the state with the largest elderly population.
Total funding was about one million dollars.
1976
Dr. Flemming issued the first Ombudsman Program guidance, which said
the program would be judged in the first year solely on the basis of the
number of community-based ombudsman programs launched and the effectiveness of
these programs in receiving and resolving complaints. In explaining this goal, he stated,
Our
nation has been conducting investigations, passing new laws and issuing new
regulations relative to nursing homes at a rapid rate during the past few
years. All of this activity will
be of little avail unless our communities are organized in such a manner that
new laws and new regulations are utilized to deal with the individual
complaints of older persons who are living in nursing homes.
The individual in the nursing home is powerless.
If the laws and regulations are not being applied to her or to him,
they might just as well not have been passed or issued.
(AoA TAM 76-24)
The
early nationwide program stressed reliance on volunteer, rather than paid,
ombudsmen.
1977
The Administration on Aging funded the National Paralegal Institute to
provide the first training program for state ombudsmen, who were called
“ombudsman developmental specialists.”
1978
In June, AoA Commissioner Robert Benedict announced an Advocacy
Assistance grant program which provided additional assistance for the state
Ombudsman and Legal Services programs. The
focus was on both individual advocacy and systems advocacy.
Grants ranged from $50,000 for most states to $135,390 for California,
which by then had the largest elderly population. To support the state and area agencies in carrying out their
advocacy functions, AoA awarded contracts in 1979 and 1980 for five
Bi-Regional Advocacy Assistance Resource Centers.
The
1978 Amendments to the Older Americans Act, passed in October, required every
state to have an Ombudsman Program and specifically defined ombudsman
functions and responsibilities.
1979
AoA awarded a grant to the newly formed National Citizens’ Coalition
for Nursing Home Reform to promote citizen involvement to improve the quality
of life for nursing home residents and strengthen linkages with the ombudsman
network, including providing training and technical assistance.
1981
Older Americans Act Amendments expanded Ombudsman Program coverage to
include board and care homes. The
name was changed from Nursing Home Ombudsman to Long-Term Care Ombudsman to
reflect this change. Other duties
remained substantially the same.
AoA
issued a program instruction (AoA-PI-81-8) which provided substantial guidance
and direction to the states in the implementation of the ombudsman provisions
in the Act.
1983-84
AoA issued a series of twenty-two papers, which constituted chapters of
an Ombudsman Technical Assistance Manual.
1984
Older Americans Act Amendments made no major changes in the Ombudsman
provisions.
The
number of local programs and complaints and the amount of program funding increased substantially; and the number of state and local paid staff and
volunteers increased 50% over 1982 levels.
1987
Older Americans Act Amendments made substantive changes in the
Ombudsman Program, including requiring states to provide for ombudsman access
to residents and residents’ records; immunity to ombudsmen for the good
faith performance of their duties and prohibitions against willful
interference with the official duties of an ombudsman and/or retaliation
against an ombudsman, resident or other individual for assisting
representatives of the program in the performance of their duties.
1988
AoA funded the National Association of State Units on Aging (NASUA) to
operate the National Center for State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Resources, in
conjunction with the National Citizens’ Coalition for Nursing Home Reform.
1992
Older Americans Act Amendments strengthened the Ombudsman Program and
transferred it to a new title in the Act., Title VII, Vulnerable Elder Rights
Protection Activities, which also included Programs for Prevention of Elder
Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the State Elder Rights and Legal Assistance
Development Program and an Outreach, Counseling and Assistance Program.
1993
The National Citizens’ Coalition for Nursing Home Reform received an
AoA grant to operate the National Long-Term Care Ombudsman Resource Center, in
conjunction with the National Association of State Units on Aging.
1994
AoA Regional Offices conducted on-site assessments of the State
Ombudsman Programs, issuing their reports in January 1995.
AoA
held four training conferences around the country and issued several program
instructions and proposed regulations on the new Title VII and held a major
symposium on “Coordination Between Long-Term Care Ombudsman and Adult
Protective Services Programs and Related Issues.”
1995
AoA implemented the National Long-Term Care Ombudsman Reporting System
(NORS), which provided substantial state and national data on ombudsman cases,
complaints and program activities, beginning in 1996.
AoA
convened a task force to discuss and develop ways to document the impact of
the Ombudsman Program and issued a report on the meeting entitled “An
Approach to Measuring the Outcomes of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program.”
Ombudsman
Programs in California, Florida, Illinois, New York and Texas participated in
Operation Restore Trust, a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
pilot Medicare and Medicaid anti-fraud and abuse effort, which returned $23 to
the Medicare Trust Fund for every $1 spent; the program was expanded to all
states in 1997 and re-named the Senior Medicare Patrol.
2000
Older Americans Act Amendments retained and updated ombudsman
provisions in Titles II, III and VII.
About
1,000 paid ombudsmen and 8,400 certified volunteer ombudsmen and 5,200 other
volunteers, working in 591 localities nationwide, investigated about 232,000
complaints made by 137,000 individuals and provided information on long-term
care to another 245,000 people. The most
frequent complaints involved lack of resident care due to inadequate staffing.
Total program funding was $57 million, about sixty percent of which was
federal and forty percent state and local.
|